By Dana Bartholomew
Staff
writer
Published Wednesday August 11,
1999
A Ventura County judge loosened the noose around Le Parc condominium
owners Tuesday by ordering a receiver to return thousands paid toward a
multimillion-dollar judgment.
Superior Court Judge Thomas J. Hutchins ruled Tuesday a court-appointed
receiver improperly collected $25,500 in special assessments from 264 Simi
Valley homeowners.
In clarifying an earlier ruling, Hutchins ordered the Le Parc Community
Association to re-collect the money by Oct. 1 for eventual payment toward
a $7.2 million debt awarded ZM Corp. during arbitration last year.
The decision left both sides of a complex legal battle bitter.
"If I do my job correctly, nobody is going to be happy; that's just the
way it works," Hutchins said before his decision.
ZM attorneys argued it was unfair to order the money returned, that
homeowners have done nothing to pay off the judgment and that stripping
the receiver of powers to levy assessments would hamper delinquent notices
-- the "teeth" of court rulings leading to eventual foreclosures.
"The association has done nothing, absolutely nothing, to satisfy the
judgment," ZM attorney Glen Campbell told the judge. "We are doing
everything proper under the court order.
"It's tantamount to try to unring the bell."
Homeowners, tired of unpaid utility bills, uncollected trash, frozen
assets and possible foreclosures at the west Simi Valley complex, argued
Hutchins should allow them the right to pay bills out of their monthly
dues.
Resident are on the verge of losing outdoor electricity, water, gas and
trash services as a result of thousands of dollars worth of unpaid bills.
"We're just asking for enough money to continue running this place, to
grant order where chaos exists," said Robert Long, an attorney
representing the Le Parc Community Association.
Jim Lingl, attorney for the former association, whose board was accused
of breach of contract and defamation of ZM Corp. five years ago, said
injuring homeowners was not the intent of Hutchins' earlier ruling.
"The people who have had their pockets robbed, the people who have paid
money, are not part of this action, they have been threatened with
foreclosure," Lingl said. "That is not pursuant to the court's order."
But whereas Hutchins was willing to clarify a June 8 decision ordering
Le Parc's new homeowners association to levy a $166-a-month special
assessment to pay off the judgement, he was not willing to order an
exemption for utilities without a new motion.
"The (ZM) receiver can keep the golden goose alive, or not. He could
take it all," Hutchins said. "I don't know why you guys haven't worked any
of this stuff out, but that's beside the point."
Two dozen Le Parc residents expressed sadness a solution was not at
hand.
"I paid over $300 last month and the utilities still aren't paid,"
Celeste, a 33-year-old Le Parc owner, said. "I can't afford $300, and
still have trash. There are going to be rats everywhere."